The Aware Negro

ShaquaTonia says:

Come on man… no matter what the narrative, no matter what name you give him, or color you paint him, this "Jesus" character is not/was not sent to this plain by the MOST HIGH YoD as a savior. There are so many contradictions in this demi-god's story that goes against so many of the MOST HIGH'S commandments that it's amazing how those of you who do study for themselves, and search for knowledge as if it was a hidden treasure for years are still being fooled. The scriptures do say that even the MOST HIGH'S elect will be deceived, and oh boy isn't the deception great.

For instance human sacrifice. The MOST HIGH calls human sacrifice an abomination, and commands us not to follow behind the Gentile in participating it. So there is no way that my YoD, the YoD of CHaBaRaCHaM, YaSHaCH, a'YaCoB, (Abaraham, Issac, and Jacob), would go against HIS own word, and have a man sacrificed as an ultimate sacrifice for the sins of all man, and/or mankind. What type of sense does that make. And there are many more contradictions, and phrases hidden in plain (that give hints to that demi-god's, (b/c if he was a productive of a divine union between a "Daughter of Man", and a divine entity, like what happened in Genesis chapter 6, then he would be considered a demi-god, and/or a "Nephilim".), true identity. Beside in Isaiah chapter 43, and verse 11 (and in many other places in the "Old Testament"), the MOST HIGH says that HE is the only savior . HE didn't say 2 other entities, (a demi-god, and a "holy spirit"), along with ME are your only saviors. Remember the MOST HIGH is a jealous YoD, and he commanded us not to put any other YoD's before HIM. So to those who are falling for that "No one gets to the Father, unless he goes through me first." foolishness, you better think twice before you get on your knees to worship someone other than the CREATOR.

SHaLaM

Tone B says:

Birth of a nation, supposedly the Nat Turner story is inaccurate. Nat Turners mother was Cheroenhaka Nottoway indigenous Indian( a black woman to many of you European indoctrinated as I was too at first) and his father was the plantation owner Benjamin Turner( the older cracka that died in the beginning of the movie and the young plantation owner that Nat Turner murdered was his brother. The so called African American has no idea who they are. Our story is in Africa and America. The indigenous person to America is the so called African American. When you say," American Indian." The first thing that comes to mind is Tonto from the Lone Ranger or some BS 🙂
The indigenous people to America are the so called African American. We are not black, colored etc…
We are Keetuwah, Aniyunwia, Tsalagi. These are the ancient names of so called black Indians who have been on so called americas( turtle islands) soil for eons. Our great, great, great ancestors are looking at us like we're crazy and confused.
The sad thing is that some of us are. It's all by design. We do not eat what our people ate. Our DNA is rearranged and a big staple of our diet was marijuana and it's illegal. Well the FDA version of it is not. Wake up kinfolk's. Our people were hanged by crackas because a lot of them refused give up their land, foods, herbs, god( Mother Earth) and heritage.

P.S. Nat Turners real name was Nat Tunica and we are from Africa. Our peoples story is destroyed by Anglos who have no history. They are culture vultures and parasites.
Facts!

One

Jordan Corley says:

The confederates wore grey and the Union wore dark blue. So the guy who snitched changed sides.

j washington says:

where can I find the movie?

Kayne Tinnermon says:

they both have they place. one is a fun family comedy & one deals with a forgotten black hero in history.. just shows how versatile we are as blacks' but dont knock one lane over the other.. not cool..

janine s says:

I'm glad it flopped.

REAL TALK 100 says:

Jesus is not the God of slavery it is the God of the enslaved peep Deuteronomy @*

Nm Wms says:

Robert Franklin Williams, Negro with Guns, Bad Brother in modern times! That's the movie to be done!

MrSuckafree247 says:

After watching the movie this evening, I came across this Youtube discussion featuring Prof. Griiff who I've admired intellectually since. I just find it strange Nate Parker is married to a European woman, I know people will use the "Love is colorless" argument which is complete bullshit. This is a revolutionary movie, so what was the REAL motivation behind the movie? What spirit was this meant to shake up. Something is fishy here. I rated the movie a "B-"

louis fabien says:

a movie about the greatest general Hannibal, Backus. Toussaint, L'ouverture.

H Walls says:

Just the fact that this white man goes around with  Nate Turner  like he is some kind of promoter of Nate Turner's ideas, something Nate Turner is quite capable of doing on his own,  says a lot, about giving white people credit for what black people conceive of.   But Professor Griff  dismisses those inaccuracies by saying, "we know they are not true."  that is the very reason we do not want it promoted as truth. It is just like saying in the original birth of a nation that demonized black men, and we say, oh well.  we know that is not true,  The point is that it is being promoted as truth, and there is a message there, like in all art, a message that tends to undermine black people's contributions in whatever form, and that is something we do not want to teach our children.  Black people have always had to combat inaccuracies about our humanity, abilities, and self worth historically by those who assume the right to write our history.  We know a lot of things about that which is inaccurate, so what are you actually saying Professor Griff that we should not criticize those inaccuracies because they appear in a film by a black filmmaker.  People have right and even a duty to criticize whether you like it or not.  Your opinion is not the only one out there.  And to be honest You seem to be full of contradiction as a self styled advocate for black people's liberation, judging by many of your pass commentary, as far as I am concerned.

Konstant Elevation Entertainment says:

This is on of the most important and era accurate, dynamic cinematic masterpieces of the last 100 years , the historical relevance is priceless, the fact that Nate Parker a filmmaker named after the Slave rebellion Leader Nat turner to make this film after being falsely accused of rap by a White Women which has led to the massacre of blacks in the past, like Oklahoma, and Rosewood, and the fact that he was acquitted of all charges by a all white jury, and that the false accuser in fact killed her own devilish self, for him to have his character smeared before the movie came out discouraging people to see based in such lies is no surprise , seeing how this cinematic story is long over due, especially because its a profound event of american history, and the fact that the brother a Black man Nate Parker did it speaks volumes to the struggle that Blacks have still in this country, not letting a White Filmmaker get credit for our story, and showcasing the most Successful slave rebellion in american history and probably indirectly the beginning of the end of Slavery in America, Much gratitude to Nate Parker For the spirit of Nat Turner working through him to get this on the silver screen finally! much Gratitude ! ah – shay to the ancestors

Father United Network says:

you people who make comments miss the hold point the brother reiterates dw griffths birth of a nation dont b no punk check out the meaning of making the film.