0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
or copy the link
Ta-Seti (Land of the bow, also known as Ta Khenti, The First-The South) was one of 42 nomes(administrative division) in Ancient Kemet. Ta-Seti was the earliest Nubian Kingdom before Kemet, dated 5,900 BCE. Bruce Williams, a curator at the University of Chicago, was instrumental in discovering numerous artifacts related to the material culture that had been found there by a previous archeologist.
http://blackhistoryfactorfiction.com/?page_id=3851
![Metallica – Whiskey In The Jar [Official Music Video]](http://theawarenegro.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/hqdefault-129.jpg "Metallica – Whiskey In The Jar [Official Music Video]")
){kind=link}
brilliant…….hotep
Keep in mind that the idea that Nubia is older than Egypt is based on Bruce Williams interpretation of Keith Seele's findings.
"In 1962, at a place called Qustul, about
180 miles (300 km) upriver from Aswan, a University of Chicago team,
under the direction of Dr. Keith Seele, discovered a series of
plundered, but still unusally rich, tombs containing massive quantities
of Egyptian trade goods and luxury items. Since the rising floodwaters
were advancing rapidly, the tombs were excavated hastily and the
material put in storage. In the early 1980's, when he first examined the
material prior to its final publication, Prehistorian Bruce B.
Williams theorized that the tombs may have belonged to a dynasty of ten
to twelve A-Group kings and that, like Upper and Lower Egypt at about
the same time, Lower Nubia may also have developed a strong centralized
authority. Two of the objects found in the tombs were sandstone
incense burners, made of local stone, carved in intaglio with scenes
that seemed to show ancient Egyptian kings, dressed in traditional tall
crown (signifying rule over the south) and protected by the falcon god
Horus. What made Williams' theory so controversial was that he
proposed that the objects did not show early Egyptian kings but rather
A-Group kings, and that the objects – and the A-Group kingship – were
earlier by at least two centuries than the Egyptian kingship of the
same form. He went on to suggest that this hypothetical Nubian kingship
became the model for the later Egyptian. The argument was quickly
seized by American Afrocentrists as proof that Egyptian-style kingship
was not home-grown but was imported from central Africa, and that the
report by the Greek historian Diodorus Siculus in the first century BC
that Egyptian civilization had derived from Nubia ("Aithiopia") was
confirmed.
While Williams' theory was intriguing, it could never be proven or
disproven absolutely because shortly after the clearing of the tombs
all of Qustul had been flooded forever by the Aswan Dam and could not
be reinvestigated. Given the large numbers of imported Egyptian goods
in the tombs, one could also never be certain if the incense burners,
too, were not simply Egyptian imports rather than Nubian products, as
most would have assumed them to be. The fact that they were made of
local stone seemed to confirm that they were Nubian, and many other
objects and pottery vessels seemed to have a Sudanese origin. Williams'
characterization of the tombs as belonging to a time "prior to any
known Egyptian kingship" now has to be modified by the recent discovery
at Abydos in Egypt of Egyptian royal artifacts that do indeed seem to
reach back as far as the Qustul tombs (about 3400 BC)."
The finding of an early Egyptian royal image:
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/08/110804220442.htm
TELL IT . . .
Great video. THANKS FOR POSTING.